Campaign Contributors Stand to Gain Nearly $700 Million From Their Measure 37 ClaimsSince Measure 37 passed in 2004, $20 Billion in Measure 37 Compensation Claims Have Been Filed Only ten donors made up two-thirds of all contributions to the Measure 37 campaign in 2004. The large contributions did not come
without expectations from the donors; they anticipated a heavy
return on investment in the form of compensation claims under the new statute. The measure passed, and it has spurred $20 billion in claims filed
statewide so far. Every county is now put in a position where it
must choose to either pay the claimants for their intended development
desires, or to scrap all
land regulations and open the door for unrestricted development, much
of which
will destroy our most beautiful areas in And let's not forget that the 20 billion will either be generated by stripping already struggling social programs or by steeply raising taxes on Oregon's citizens. These campaign contributors knew what they were doing when they invested in Measure 37. A little money up front to change state land-use laws could result in a massive windfall for them. In this section we
will draw attention to the top donors of Measure 37, and will examine
their subsequent claims under the new
law. As you shall see, most of the major donors stand to gain huge
returns on their
initial campaign contributions. In 2004, Measure 37 passed because
voters thought it would permit citizens to build an additional house or
two. But the vast majority of the compensation money filed under the
new measure are from big timer companies wanting to either develop
pristine land or reap the benefits of state compensation. This forum
will work to expose the ridiculous Measure 37 claims filed by big
business. |

